Skip to main content

Participation and Legitimacy

By
The reading this week seems to coincide with the discussion in my political sociology class about how political participation can be a way of showing allegiance to/reinforce legitimacy of the power structure. This connection of legitimacy and participation somewhat shapes my reading of Bennett (2008) about the two types of resistance, "pass" and "protest" concerning deferral policies against gay men in blood donation. They make me question the nature of resistance to the aforesaid deferral policies, and the external validity of such dual resistance in a different context.Bennett points out in the article, not without irony, that the patriarchal structure is reflected in the rhetoric of gay men interviewed, in the form of comparing "risk behaviors" of gay men and women. However, by attributing it to the gender composition of the blood center, Bennett seems to have overlooked the assumption underlying the comparison between gay men and female CSWers that has given legitimacy to the claim of relationship between "risk behavior" and susceptibility. By pointing out that there are people with "more risky behavior", legitimacy is given to the act of sanction against a group of people defined as of high risk, and the act of monitoring and surveillance built into the blood donation process.
Insofar as routine participation is encouraged in the power structure as an articulation of "good citizenship", as Anthony M. Orum and John G. Dale (2009) point out in Political Sociolgy, generosity and altruism is only part (and a small part) of the motive for participation. Thus it is important to put the whole discussion about deferral policy in the backdrop of Blood Drive as a structured, controlled and monitored activity while examine the resistive nature of acts of "pass" or "protest".
I think Shaunak is right in saying that the gay male population is far from being a typical "disadvantaged" group, and want to highlight the difference between the personal risks that they take in resisting (psychological, periodical, imaginary, low withdrawal cost) is in no way comparable to the ones taken by CSWers in Kolkata (physical, prolonged, real and irrevocable) (Basu & Dutta, 2009).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Purdue's Professional Revolutionary

By RK
In light of the discussion we had during our advisee meeting on Friday about being strategic in our means as critical scholars I was struck by the words of Lenin who emphasizes the role of the intellectual. He says, "The history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own effort, is able to develop only trade-union consciousness, i.e., it may itself realize the necessity for combining in unions, for fighting against the employers and for striving to compel the government to pass necessary labor legislation, etc. The theory of socialism, however, grew out of the philosophic, historical representatives of the propertied classes, the intellectuals." (pg. 74) This idea of the bourgeois socialist intelligentsia as an instrument of raising consciousness and fomenting dissent is an ideal one I am sure but in contemporary times we, the academics, forming a substantial part of the "intellectual elite", occupy a unique position which forces us into ...
6 comments
Read more

Echoing Malcom

By Saqib
Reading Malcolm X's speeches, it is clear that he points to a historical trend in the process of obtaining independence from tyranny. In other words, history shows that people must be committed to overhauling the system and prepared to sacrifice for a great cause. The trouble comes in overcoming the anesthetization of the natural impulse that people have to change their surroundings. I feel that this is incredibly difficult in the modern world when entire industries have been created for the sole purpose of distraction and self-indulgence. Has that impulse changed? Is it still there? Sometimes I think that when people become so self-absorbed and ignorant of rampant injustice, they will only react when its too late. For instance, there have always been economic disparities but public anger only sets in when their houses are foreclosed and savings wiped out. Revolution then becomes the last refuge of the hopeless. Is there any point to calling for revolution when the only precursor t...
2 comments
Read more