Skip to main content

Go For The Gold

I was interested by the description of money as laid out in Das Kapital. Marx seems to agree that setting a gold standard to back paper currency. He describes this as a way to ensure a stable and manageable supply of paper currency commensurable with the supply of gold. Marx mentions that gold seems to have a true internal value, probably conditioned by society. Surprisingly, I find myself agreeing with Marx on much of his monetary policy.

I would have liked him to further explain the problems on credit-based currency. This is the form of currency we currently have, and in my opinion, the cause of much the global economic problems. This is the result of the ending of the Bretton-Woods agreement in 1971, when the gold standard was abolished and the dollar was made the official default currency for the entire world. But the dollar doesn't have any internal value or use value of its own, its basically fiat paper currency created through loans that has been masked as a commodity. Make no mistake, the world seems to be due for a massive monetary crisis, as Marx himself foreshadowed.

The gold standard itself is not problem-free also. As Marx mentions, the hoarding of actual gold supplies leads can lead to imbalance in the market and wealth disparity. I'm not to sure of his solution though, having access to global trade may not necessarily stop the hoarding of gold if the gold dealers now work internationally rather than locally. The dollar is an international currency, so the gold hoarding problem still remains in my opinion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Purdue's Professional Revolutionary

In light of the discussion we had during our advisee meeting on Friday about being strategic in our means as critical scholars I was struck by the words of Lenin who emphasizes the role of the intellectual. He says, "The history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own effort, is able to develop only trade-union consciousness, i.e., it may itself realize the necessity for combining in unions, for fighting against the employers and for striving to compel the government to pass necessary labor legislation, etc. The theory of socialism, however, grew out of the philosophic, historical representatives of the propertied classes, the intellectuals." (pg. 74) This idea of the bourgeois socialist intelligentsia as an instrument of raising consciousness and fomenting dissent is an ideal one I am sure but in contemporary times we, the academics, forming a substantial part of the "intellectual elite", occupy a unique position which forces us into ...

Echoing Malcom

Reading Malcolm X's speeches, it is clear that he points to a historical trend in the process of obtaining independence from tyranny. In other words, history shows that people must be committed to overhauling the system and prepared to sacrifice for a great cause. The trouble comes in overcoming the anesthetization of the natural impulse that people have to change their surroundings. I feel that this is incredibly difficult in the modern world when entire industries have been created for the sole purpose of distraction and self-indulgence. Has that impulse changed? Is it still there? Sometimes I think that when people become so self-absorbed and ignorant of rampant injustice, they will only react when its too late. For instance, there have always been economic disparities but public anger only sets in when their houses are foreclosed and savings wiped out. Revolution then becomes the last refuge of the hopeless. Is there any point to calling for revolution when the only precursor t...