Skip to main content

The Capitalist/Communist Conundrum

By Saqib
I too was struck while reading Engels and Lenin on the apparent common underpinnings found in both the capitalist and communist ideologies. In Engels' writings, he discusses the parasitical nature of the bourgeois class whose monopoly on the means of production is cited as the chief reason for underdeveloped condition of the masses. What was conspicuously absent from his list of principles was the manner of governance which was to take shape under the perceived communist state. What democratic safeguards would be put in place to ensure that the bourgeois would not be replaced by another "dominant political class" capable of abusing the confiscated property and redirected wealth? Engels' hesitates to embrace the strategy of armed revolution and insists that "society" will seize the means of production, but a society represented by whom?

Ultimately, the principles as communism as spelled out by Engels suffer from the same fatal flaw that lies at the heart of the capitalist system. Namely, the assumption that the social order and financial system will be perpetuated through the "limitless expansion of production." Is a system based on unlimited growth on a finite world truly sustainable? Given the historical framing of these writings, in the mid-1800s in the age of the Industrial Revolution and the internal combustion engine, the claim that such a system will propel civilization forward was more than understandable. Ecological and environmental disasters, the peaking of the global oil supply, and rapid population growth of today suggests otherwise.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Purdue's Professional Revolutionary

By RK
In light of the discussion we had during our advisee meeting on Friday about being strategic in our means as critical scholars I was struck by the words of Lenin who emphasizes the role of the intellectual. He says, "The history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own effort, is able to develop only trade-union consciousness, i.e., it may itself realize the necessity for combining in unions, for fighting against the employers and for striving to compel the government to pass necessary labor legislation, etc. The theory of socialism, however, grew out of the philosophic, historical representatives of the propertied classes, the intellectuals." (pg. 74) This idea of the bourgeois socialist intelligentsia as an instrument of raising consciousness and fomenting dissent is an ideal one I am sure but in contemporary times we, the academics, forming a substantial part of the "intellectual elite", occupy a unique position which forces us into ...
6 comments
Read more

Whose means justifies their end?

By
I spend a lot of my time teaching and disciplining children now-a-days and through these experiences, I have found many similarities in the ways that Marx and Engel construct their arguments for communism and against capitalism, most of which are shaped around the concept of deflection. First, let me provide an example from which my conclusions are built, all of which are inducted from daily experiences. I know that my experience is nothing novel or new, especially if anyone reading this has had the pleasure of working with large groups of kids. In a classroom there is supposed to be only one goal, one guider, and one “law maker” and that lovely job title has been bestowed upon me, the teacher. In trying to achieve my one goal to teach multiplication, I tell every student to be quiet and do their work. While not paying attention, I hear several of the students talking. When I look up, I single out the first one that I see talking (lets call him Crandon). I tell Crandon, “If you continu...
7 comments
Read more

Neoliberalism - Is it a necessary evil?

By
The term 'neoliberalism' came into existence in 1938, but started to get used during the 1960s. It is another label for 'economic liberalism.' However, the leftists use neoliberalism as a pejorative term, showing discontent with the ideologies that neoliberalism brings to the table. The term is also used neutrally though by many political organizations [ source ]. The essence of neoliberalism is quite straight forward - economic control of resources should be transferred (even if partially) from the government to the private sector. The belief is that such actions will make for a better economic system with improved economic productivity, and in the process create an efficient government. However as Dutta & Pal (in press) suggests, ideologies such as neoliberalism is supported and promoted by certain organizations (MNCs, TNCs, certain governments) because it helps them maintain the power structure in their favor, and thus continue to exert control over the alrea...
Post a Comment
Read more