Skip to main content

Rhetoric and Revolution

By
Malcolm X's speeches and the emphasis on speech in the events leading up to the Black Power movement were good examples of the role of rhetoric and it's connection to activist-driven social movements. For instance, in Malcolm X's phrase 'Ballot or Bullet', we see how publics are motivated towards collective consciousness. The phrase used is brief, is parsimonious, but more importantly, forces the audience to think about the inevitability of revolution.

Similarly, Malcolm X at holds the Democratic Party responsible for the continued subjugation of the Black population. Once again, we see the power of rhetoric in this context, when he calls the Democrats 'Dixiecrats'. The term Dixiecrat is used to describe members of the States' Rights Democratic Party of the Southern US. This party was a segregationist party that emerged out of the Democratic Party, and gained control of the Southern factions of the Democratic Party.

For sure, the reason for the Black Power advocates and Malcolm X to be regarded as a threat was the threat of disruption and violence that they always promised. However, once again, we see the role of the symbolic in communicating the material threat. The rhetorical simplicity of 'Ballot or Bullet' underlies the simplicity of the argument of the oppressed. A right to self-governance or violence.

While listening to the clips, I was reminded of the phrases used during the early years of the Cultural Revolution. What is interesting is that during a period of crisis, what is defined as beautiful, or poetic also changes. For instance, the phrase, 红色恐怖万岁 (roughly translated as "Long live the Red Terror") was used to galvanize a generation. The translation does not capture the poesis of the phrase here. In this context, the 'terror' was what was exalted, made to be the object of desire. In Malcolm X's phrase, the beauty lies in the fact that both the options: bullet or ballot, are equally accessible. Of course, beautification of violence makes a lot of people uncomfortable; but in the face of decades of economic exploitation and segregation, the possibility of rebalancing oppressive social forces can pull a lot of weight.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Purdue's Professional Revolutionary

By RK
In light of the discussion we had during our advisee meeting on Friday about being strategic in our means as critical scholars I was struck by the words of Lenin who emphasizes the role of the intellectual. He says, "The history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own effort, is able to develop only trade-union consciousness, i.e., it may itself realize the necessity for combining in unions, for fighting against the employers and for striving to compel the government to pass necessary labor legislation, etc. The theory of socialism, however, grew out of the philosophic, historical representatives of the propertied classes, the intellectuals." (pg. 74) This idea of the bourgeois socialist intelligentsia as an instrument of raising consciousness and fomenting dissent is an ideal one I am sure but in contemporary times we, the academics, forming a substantial part of the "intellectual elite", occupy a unique position which forces us into ...
6 comments
Read more

Echoing Malcom

By Saqib
Reading Malcolm X's speeches, it is clear that he points to a historical trend in the process of obtaining independence from tyranny. In other words, history shows that people must be committed to overhauling the system and prepared to sacrifice for a great cause. The trouble comes in overcoming the anesthetization of the natural impulse that people have to change their surroundings. I feel that this is incredibly difficult in the modern world when entire industries have been created for the sole purpose of distraction and self-indulgence. Has that impulse changed? Is it still there? Sometimes I think that when people become so self-absorbed and ignorant of rampant injustice, they will only react when its too late. For instance, there have always been economic disparities but public anger only sets in when their houses are foreclosed and savings wiped out. Revolution then becomes the last refuge of the hopeless. Is there any point to calling for revolution when the only precursor t...
2 comments
Read more