Skip to main content

Organizing possibilities

In the contemporary scenario of global-recession it is important to study the life and struggle of workers of semi-organized and unorganized sectors of developing countries. In my personal opinion, one concept (i.e.-to consider class as one of the main basis of study organizational and societal process) and two approaches (i.e. - a bottom-up 'agentic' process of organizing and performing resistance; and application of subaltern studies framework to understand/organize the marginalized people) may be useful in this regard. These concept and approaches are not mutually exclusive; rather they may be applied in combined (partially or fully) form [as and when necessary].

Some of the social scientists have argued that, in this phase of New Economy and in the era of Information age, the traditional class based approach of understanding organizational processes is no longer relevant. On the contrary, scholars like Cloud (2001) emphasized on the importance of the role of power, structure and class in the present organizational context. She further stressed on the traditional approach/ understanding of class in order to establish ‘control over political and economic institutions’ by the workers. Therefore, instead of surface level make-up/ polishing approach we may adopt more fundamental approach (based on class) of structural transformation to ensure long-term change in favor of working communities.

Many organizational communication literatures advocate workplace civility, work culture (along with idea of democracy and CSR) within an organization; which essentially legitimize a top-down approach. But, scholars like Machiavelly and Clegg recognized and stressed on the transformative and resistive potential of the agencies. Both in case of day-to-day practice of micro-resistance (including collective bargaining) and for collective (material) revolution, the bottom-up organization process (engagement of agency) is useful. Thus a constant interaction with power and structure is essential for an agency to legitimize (and organize in favor of) the issues in order to achieve the demands.

Again, in contrast to managerial (organization level) or administrative (state or policy level) point of view, a subaltern studies approach gives us the opportunity to understand issues/problems from a perspective of marginalized population (or person). Legitimization (and reflexive representation) of subaltern voices (through academia, media or other means) is crucial because it creates alternate discursive spaces (socio-cultural, political and economical) (Kim and Dutta, 2009). Apart from the discursive opportunity within organization, the legitimization process is helpful for creating awareness, and thereby it opens up the possibility of alternate and broader organizing and solidarity.

Therefore, realization of importance of the roles of class and potentials of agency, and application of a bottom-up and/or subaltern studies approach may create alternate spaces and opportunities of revolution and resistance (in favor of workers) in the contemporary neoliberal world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Purdue's Professional Revolutionary

In light of the discussion we had during our advisee meeting on Friday about being strategic in our means as critical scholars I was struck by the words of Lenin who emphasizes the role of the intellectual. He says, "The history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own effort, is able to develop only trade-union consciousness, i.e., it may itself realize the necessity for combining in unions, for fighting against the employers and for striving to compel the government to pass necessary labor legislation, etc. The theory of socialism, however, grew out of the philosophic, historical representatives of the propertied classes, the intellectuals." (pg. 74) This idea of the bourgeois socialist intelligentsia as an instrument of raising consciousness and fomenting dissent is an ideal one I am sure but in contemporary times we, the academics, forming a substantial part of the "intellectual elite", occupy a unique position which forces us into ...

Whose means justifies their end?

I spend a lot of my time teaching and disciplining children now-a-days and through these experiences, I have found many similarities in the ways that Marx and Engel construct their arguments for communism and against capitalism, most of which are shaped around the concept of deflection. First, let me provide an example from which my conclusions are built, all of which are inducted from daily experiences. I know that my experience is nothing novel or new, especially if anyone reading this has had the pleasure of working with large groups of kids. In a classroom there is supposed to be only one goal, one guider, and one “law maker” and that lovely job title has been bestowed upon me, the teacher. In trying to achieve my one goal to teach multiplication, I tell every student to be quiet and do their work. While not paying attention, I hear several of the students talking. When I look up, I single out the first one that I see talking (lets call him Crandon). I tell Crandon, “If you continu...

Is participation just a rhetoric?

Participation and participatory strategies are used in different spaces globally to involve communities and ensure their voices in the discursive space. The culture centered approach foregrounds active participation of community members in the construction of shared meanings and experience (Dutta, 2008). Basu and Dutta (2009) underline the importance of participation of community members in the enunciation of health problems as a step toward achieving meaningful change. My experience with participatory projects involving children and community members also bears testimony to the importance of participation in impacting society; effecting a sustainable social change. But at the same time, this question looms large in my reflexive spaces that "Is it all just a co-optive process as the structural issues have remain untouched?" Basu and Dutta (2009) discuss different approaches of participation, critique the top down participatory campaigns and provide an alternative theorizing o...