Skip to main content

Military Research on Embedding

One of the capstone projects completed by the students at the Department of Defense Joint Course in Communication compares news stories with embedded reporters with those stories with non-embedded reporters, pointing out that embedded reporting was more favorable toward the military, thus suggesting that the "results are beneficial to the military because public support is crucial to morale and a successful military operation." The statement makes explicit the implicit values and biases of this military-funded project, perhaps drawing our attention to the role of the project in serving the public affairs needs of the military. This sort of academic involvement in promoting military agenda raises critical questions regarding the ideology guiding such research and the politics of such research. Research like this conducted under the auspices of dominant social actors serves the power structure rather than questioning the ways in which it operates. The research project is implicitly co-opted into the military agenda by supplying a set of legitimate research questions and methodlogical tools for answering these questions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Purdue's Professional Revolutionary

In light of the discussion we had during our advisee meeting on Friday about being strategic in our means as critical scholars I was struck by the words of Lenin who emphasizes the role of the intellectual. He says, "The history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own effort, is able to develop only trade-union consciousness, i.e., it may itself realize the necessity for combining in unions, for fighting against the employers and for striving to compel the government to pass necessary labor legislation, etc. The theory of socialism, however, grew out of the philosophic, historical representatives of the propertied classes, the intellectuals." (pg. 74) This idea of the bourgeois socialist intelligentsia as an instrument of raising consciousness and fomenting dissent is an ideal one I am sure but in contemporary times we, the academics, forming a substantial part of the "intellectual elite", occupy a unique position which forces us into ...

Echoing Malcom

Reading Malcolm X's speeches, it is clear that he points to a historical trend in the process of obtaining independence from tyranny. In other words, history shows that people must be committed to overhauling the system and prepared to sacrifice for a great cause. The trouble comes in overcoming the anesthetization of the natural impulse that people have to change their surroundings. I feel that this is incredibly difficult in the modern world when entire industries have been created for the sole purpose of distraction and self-indulgence. Has that impulse changed? Is it still there? Sometimes I think that when people become so self-absorbed and ignorant of rampant injustice, they will only react when its too late. For instance, there have always been economic disparities but public anger only sets in when their houses are foreclosed and savings wiped out. Revolution then becomes the last refuge of the hopeless. Is there any point to calling for revolution when the only precursor t...