The historical relationship between the First and the Third, the West and the rest, the North and the South has been occupied by symbols of superiority of one over the other. The inherent notion of the West being the center of civilization, while the "other" being scripted as the primitive served the logic of colonialism. Spaces elsewhere could be occupied and controlled under the very argument that they needed development to be brought to them, that they needed to be liberated by the White men and women who only wanted to do good. In the early history of colonialism, this wanting to do good was embedded in the desire of the Christian missionaries to convert the savages, and lift the burden of the soul. The contemporary rhetoric of neocolonialism has replaced the cross with the white coat, with the power of Science and Development that seek to emancipate the Third World. Once again, the symbol of the white coat utilizes the trope of emancipation to bring Third World spaces under the hegemonic control of the West.
Allow me to be a devil's advocate and speak for students who come form the "other"-ed cultural background, who were, and perhaps still are embracing multicultural imperialism in area studies, or in "inter-cultural communication" in this case. My point is, so long as the site of knowledge, and knowledge creation is West-centered, students from non-western backgrounds will face the difficult choice between co-optation and exclusion. As an international student, you are expected to "bring something different to the table", and the "table" can be a frustrating place: at best it will be in the form where the non-western culture that you represent is "seen as a rich storehouse of timeless wisdom from which the present had degenerated", at worst it will be a cultural freak show. I was shocked and deeply disturbed one time when a Chinese scholar invited to give a lecture on "culture" spent 15 minutes talking about "Chinese...
Comments